Pages

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Mageborn: The Blacksmith’s Son by Michael G. Manning


Several weeks ago, I met a friend who I hadn’t seen in 14 years.  “I thought you would have produced one by now,” she said to me. Ah, the dreaded ‘fruit of the loins’ question. While I racked my brain for a reasonable explanation (my astrologer told me that I would die a most hideous death the day my progeny saw the light of day etc.), my friend interrupted me, “of all the people I know, I thought you’d be the first to write a book.” Saved by the book. “I am sure you have plenty of stories,” she adds. 

If writing a book was as simple as putting a story to paper, we’d all be authors. I am led to believe that publishing is in the winter of its existence. Nevertheless, the industry is more prolific than ever before in human history. Writers are seeping out of the unlikeliest places; cracks in the walls, commodes and the monotony of Texan suburbia. It’s the last of these that’s home to Michael G. Manning, a practicing pharmacist and avowed fantasy and science fiction reader.

A story, however engaging (and by this I am not saying The Blacksmith’s Son is engaging), is a wasted effort if it isn’t matched by an appropriate style. The Blacksmith’s Son is no different from the hundreds of fantasy books out in the market with a predictable plot with all the regular devices that writers of the genre can’t do without; a male protagonist, his chums, faux-medieval setting, magic and indomitable bad guys. But, Manning shuns the crowd and takes his novel to interesting depths in the ocean of mediocre writing. 

The style is so immature that I wondered if the author had some help from his two kids. Manning relies heavily on an explanation driven narrative instead of focussing on dialogue. The story is narrated at times through the first person perspective of Mordecai, Manning’s smug hero and at other times in third person from the points of view of other characters. The result is extremely confusing and crude. The language is bizarrely anachronistic. His poorly developed characters implore each other with ‘gonnas’, complain about hangovers and order room service in a medieval castle.  And is this meant to be teen or young adult fiction because ye olde rape scene that the plot seems to hinge on is pretty graphic.   

Story and style are the yin and yang of fiction. This is Manning’s first book so I suppose some of the blame also lies with his editors for not giving him adequate guidance. My advice to him (if he cares about his readers) is to clean up his language and eliminate these stylistic flaws from the next book in the Mageborn series.                  

5 comments:

Horrid Helen said...

Michael G Manning has succeeded in an arena where you appear to have failed. His 'immature' and 'crude' style have won him over 100,000 dedicated followers.

Sour Grapes, Sir, are a very bitter fruit. Good luck with your own scribing.

I strongly suspect this will not be published due to the fact it doesn't agree with your very acerbic review.

Adi said...

:) Well, Horrid Helen, you're wrong about me censoring your comment. What arena are you referring to me failing in? A lot of people who leave caustic remarks on my blog assume that I am some sort of failed writer - when I am in fact the exact opposite - a passionate reader. It appears to me that you envision a world where everyone salutes writers for stringing words together with no room for differences of opinion, and nothing more than superficial criticism. What a tragic world that would be! A world of followers :) Have fun being one among the hundred thousand.

Jenni said...

I agree with some of your review. However, you were over the top in your criticism. Clean up the language? Why? It's part of the characters. That is a personal opinion on your part and as such you are entitled to it but I disagree with you. Stylistic flaws? Yes, most definitely but as you said the blame is shared by the editor.

I enjoyed The Blacksmith's Son. Was it a masterpiece of fictional work? No but the storyline was entertaining. The second book of the series, The Line of Illeniel, so far has shown Michael G. Manning is improving. I am looking forward to finishing this book and reading the third to see how this author continues to develop.

I will also agree with you on the fact that the world would be rather boring if we all agreed on everything. The world would be much nicer if we, as a society, would be more discerning with our words as well.

Jacobson said...

Wow, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought so. Fan numbers are certainly important, especially in determining the quality of the literature. Like Twilight, right?

Ha. Sarcasm aside, immature is a spot on description. Manning tends to "tell" when he should "show." Reading this book made me feel like he believed I was too stupid to infer meaning from the text, and that he needed to guide my attention incessantly.

Want a beautifully-told, emotionally engaging story? Read Ordinary Scott Card. Want a fascinating world setting? Read Brandon Sanderson.

Adi said...

:) agree, agree, agree!

It appears (from your blog) that you're in the process of writing a book. Hope you won't be cultivating a coterie of fawning followers who'll bless your work with pleasant, mediocre rubbish.

If you want some undiplomatic and gratuitous comments, do send me a copy :)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...